Winter v. City of Geneva

203 A.D.2d 939, 611 N.Y.S.2d 82
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting plaintiffs’ motion to file a late notice of claim. Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the failure to file timely a notice of claim. The fact that an attorney was not immediately consulted because plaintiff Karl Winter, Jr., assumed that the pain in his hands would go away is not a sufficient excuse (see, Matter of Martin v City of New York, 100 AD2d 879). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Curran, J.— Late Notice of Claim.) Present — Denman, P. J., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winter v. City of Geneva, 203 A.D.2d 939, 611 N.Y.S.2d 82 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 939 (Winter v. City of Geneva) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ertel v. Town of Amherst
267 A.D.2d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Mark v. Board of Education
255 A.D.2d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Doherty v. City of New York
251 A.D.2d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Thompson v. Chalich
227 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)