Winter v. Beal, Lynch & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Winter v. Beal, Lynch & Co.

639 N.E.2d 411, 83 N.Y.2d 944

DecidedJune 16, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 639 N.E.2d 411 (Winter v. Beal, Lynch & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winter v. Beal, Lynch & Co., 639 N.E.2d 411, 83 N.Y.2d 944 (N.Y. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order which affirmed that part of the Supreme Court’s determination denying plaintiffs cross motion to amend the amended complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from [945]*945does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order which affirmed that part of the Supreme Court’s determination denying plaintiffs cross motion to amend the amended complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from [945]*945does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

639 N.E.2d 411, 83 N.Y.2d 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-v-beal-lynch-co-ny-1994.