Winter Kay Arthur v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 13, 2019·No. 05-18-00075-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered March 13, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00075-CR

WINTER KAY ARTHUR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16-30605-CC2-M

ORDER This appeal is REINSTATED.

Pursuant to the Court’s January 22, 2019 order, the trial court has filed findings of fact

and a conclusion of law regarding the two-part video exhibit filed in the appellate record as

“Amend State’s Exhibit 4.” Among its findings, the trial court finds that Part 001 of amended

State’s Exhibit 4 was played to the jury while Part 002 was not. The trial court concludes that

Part 002 of amended State’s Exhibit 4 was not admitted into evidence or played to the jury. The

trial court recommends that the Court grant the State’s November 27, 2018 motion to correct the

amended reporter’s record and that we strike Part 002 of amended State’s Exhibit 4.

We ADOPT the trial court’s findings, conclusion, and recommendation as stated above. We GRANT the portion of the State’s November 27, 2018 motion seeking to correct the

amended reporter’s record. We STRIKE “Amend State’s Exhibit 4 Part 002” from the record

on appeal.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winter Kay Arthur v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Winter Kay Arthur v. State (Winter Kay Arthur v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.