Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
271 A.2d 61, 160 Conn. 546
Opinion
Because the findings of subordinate facts are fatally inconsistent, the conclusion of the referee as to the fair market value of the real estate cannot be sustained.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission, 271 A.2d 61, 160 Conn. 546 (Colo. 1970).
271 A.2d 61 (Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.