Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
271 A.2d 61, 160 Conn. 546
This text of 271 A.2d 61 (Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission, 271 A.2d 61, 160 Conn. 546 (Colo. 1970).
Opinion
Because the findings of subordinate facts are fatally inconsistent, the conclusion of the referee as to the fair market value of the real estate cannot be sustained.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
271 A.2d 61, 160 Conn. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winter-inc-v-urban-redevelopment-commission-conn-1970.