Winter Company v. . Traders National Bank of Rochester
135 N.E. 901, 233 N.Y. 522, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 925
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winter Company v. . Traders National Bank of Rochester, 135 N.E. 901, 233 N.Y. 522, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 925 (N.Y. 1922).
135 N.E. 901 (Winter Company v. . Traders National Bank of Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.