Winston v. Winston

189 U.S. 506, 23 S. Ct. 852, 47 L. Ed. 922, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1385
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 13, 1903·No. No. 227·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Eugene Sweeney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Daniel E. Lynch for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175 ; Streitwolf v. Streitwolf, 181 U. S. 179 ; Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S. 14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winston v. Winston, 189 U.S. 506, 23 S. Ct. 852, 47 L. Ed. 922, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1385 (1903).

189 U.S. 506 (Winston v. Winston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruno v. Bruno
70 Misc. 2d 284 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)
Schumer v. Schumer
205 Misc. 235 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Richardson v. Richardson
200 Misc. 778 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
de Baillet-Latour v. de Baillet-Latour
94 N.E.2d 715 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)
In re the Estate Blum
185 Misc. 43 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1945)
Smith v. Foto
280 N.W. 790 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)
Ward v. Ward
176 S.E. 708 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1934)
In re the Estate of Briggs
138 Misc. 136 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1930)