Winston v. United States

Federal Circuit

Winston v. United States

444 F. App'x 452

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Winston v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 465 F. App'x 960 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 22, 2011·No. 2011-5093·Unpublished

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

Michael Winston moves for “protection” and submits various letters and a document entitled “Rule 60-B Motion.” The United States moves for leave to respond.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Winston’s motions are denied. Arguments concerning this case should be placed in the briefs, and not in letters.

(2) The motion to respond is granted and the response is accepted. The United States should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

ORDER

Michael Winston moves for “protection” and submits various letters and a document entitled “Rule 60-B Motion.” The United States moves for leave to respond.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Winston’s motions are denied. Arguments concerning this case should be placed in the briefs, and not in letters.

(2) The motion to respond is granted and the response is accepted. The United States should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

Winston v. United States, 444 F. App'x 452 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

444 F. App'x 452 (Winston v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.