Winston v. United States
This text of 568 F. App'x 198 (Winston v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Monte Decarlos Winston appeals the district court’s orders granting summary [199]*199judgment to the United States and dismissing Winston’s complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012), and denying Winston’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Winston v. United States, No. 3:ll-cv-00812-REP (E.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2013 & Jan. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
568 F. App'x 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winston-v-united-states-ca4-2014.