Winston v. United States Attorney General

Fourth Circuit

Winston v. United States Attorney General

580 F. App'x 196

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2014·No. No. 14-6307·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Monte Decarlos Winston, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for immediate release, which was filed after the district court dismissed Winston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Winston v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 3:12-cv-00172-REP (E.D.Va. Jan. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Monte Decarlos Winston, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for immediate release, which was filed after the district court dismissed Winston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Winston v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 3:12-cv-00172-REP (E.D.Va. Jan. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Winston v. United States Attorney General, 580 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

580 F. App'x 196 (Winston v. United States Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related