Winston v. Office of Naval Research
This text of 677 F. App'x 837 (Winston v. Office of Naval Research) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Nicole Yvette Winston appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(l) (2012), and denying her motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Winston v. Office of Naval Research, No. 8:16-cv-01797~PWG, 2016 WL 4194188 (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2016 & Sept. 12, 2016). We deny Winston’s motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 F. App'x 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winston-v-office-of-naval-research-ca4-2017.