Winston v. Central Life Assurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Winston v. Central Life Assurance Co.

557 So. 2d 590, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 97, 1990 WL 1047

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 1990·No. No. 88-2486·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s ruling on all points raised on appeal. Jonas v. Central Life Assurance Co., 528 So.2d 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), review denied, 542 So.2d 989 (Fla.1989).

We remand this case to the trial court to clarify the final judgment and determine the amount of medical expenses appellee will be responsible for, including those which were not paid by the PIP policy, the $2,000.00 deductible and twenty percent of the remaining medical bills. We also remand so that the trial court may determine the prevailing party for the award of attorney’s fees.

DOWNEY, STONE and POLEN JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s ruling on all points raised on appeal. Jonas v. Central Life Assurance Co., 528 So.2d 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), review denied, 542 So.2d 989 (Fla.1989).

We remand this case to the trial court to clarify the final judgment and determine the amount of medical expenses appellee will be responsible for, including those which were not paid by the PIP policy, the $2,000.00 deductible and twenty percent of the remaining medical bills. We also remand so that the trial court may determine the prevailing party for the award of attorney’s fees.

DOWNEY, STONE and POLEN JJ„ concur.

Winston v. Central Life Assurance Co., 557 So. 2d 590, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 97, 1990 WL 1047 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

557 So. 2d 590 (Winston v. Central Life Assurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related