Winston v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Winston v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

63 A.D.2d 652, 405 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 A.D.2d 652 (Winston v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winston v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services, 63 A.D.2d 652, 405 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated August 24, 1977, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated June 17, 1976, which, after a hearing, dismissed petitioner’s complaint alleging an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment. Proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as untimely for failure to institute the proceeding within 30 days after service of the order of the Human Rights Appeal Board, as required by section 298 of the Executive Law. We note that the order of the board was supported by substantial evidence and that petitioner failed to make out even a prima facie case of discrimination (see New York Inst, of Technology v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 AD2d 132, revd on other [653]*653grounds 40 NY2d 316). Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated August 24, 1977, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated June 17, 1976, which, after a hearing, dismissed petitioner’s complaint alleging an unlawful discriminatory practice relating to employment. Proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as untimely for failure to institute the proceeding within 30 days after service of the order of the Human Rights Appeal Board, as required by section 298 of the Executive Law. We note that the order of the board was supported by substantial evidence and that petitioner failed to make out even a prima facie case of discrimination (see New York Inst, of Technology v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 AD2d 132, revd on other [653]*653grounds 40 NY2d 316). Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.2d 652, 405 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winston-v-board-of-cooperative-educational-services-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack