Winston Morrison v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1999
Docket98-2921
StatusUnpublished

This text of Winston Morrison v. United States (Winston Morrison v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winston Morrison v. United States, (8th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 98-2921 ___________

Winston Morrison, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: February 18, 1999 Filed: February 24, 1999 ___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Winston Morrison, a citizen of Freeport, Grand Bahamas, appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, in which he claimed his counsel was ineffective at resentencing for failing to raise his deportable-alien status as a basis for downward departure. Upon de novo review, see United States v. Duke, 50 F.3d 571, 576 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 885 (1995), we conclude denial was warranted. Among other things, Morrison cannot show he suffered prejudice by his counsel’s alleged deficient performance, because the district court indicated it would not have

1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. granted Morrison a downward departure on the basis of his alien status. See Auman v. United States, 67 F.3d 157, 162 (8th Cir. 1995) (counsel’s failure to object at sentencing to use of prior conviction as predicate offense was not ineffective assistance because no credible evidence pointed to conclusion that district court would have changed its ruling based on objection from counsel).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Winston Morrison v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winston-morrison-v-united-states-ca8-1999.