Winston Lloyd v. State of Maryland, Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Maryland

936 F.2d 567, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19798, 1991 WL 113594
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 28, 1991
Docket91-6772
StatusUnpublished

This text of 936 F.2d 567 (Winston Lloyd v. State of Maryland, Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winston Lloyd v. State of Maryland, Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Maryland, 936 F.2d 567, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19798, 1991 WL 113594 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

936 F.2d 567
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Winston LLOYD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND, Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of
the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 91-6772.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 27, 1991.
Decided June 28, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-90-1056-B)

Winston Lloyd, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Valerie Johnston Smith, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Winston Lloyd seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. State of Maryland, CA-90-1056-B (D.Md. Jan. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
936 F.2d 567, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19798, 1991 WL 113594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winston-lloyd-v-state-of-maryland-joseph-curran-jr-ca4-1991.