Winston Charles Heron v. Michael Kemp Aduddell
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-20-00288-CV __________________
WINSTON CHARLES HERON, Appellant
V.
MICHAEL KEMP ADUDDELL, Appellee __________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 20-08-10306-CV __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Winston Charles Heron filed a letter, which he designated as his
brief, but failed to provide a copy of the brief to lead counsel for appellee. On
February 12, 2021, we directed Heron to provide a copy of the brief to lead counsel
for appellee, certify the fact of service in the form provided by Rule 9.5(e) of the
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and file the certificate of service with the Court
of Appeals no later than February 22, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5(e). On March
2, 2021, we notified the parties that the Court had not received a response from
1 Heron and warned that if Heron failed to comply, the appeal would be submitted on
the record alone on March 12, 2021, which could result in dismissal for want of
prosecution. Heron has not filed the certificate or otherwise indicated that he served
a copy of the brief on appellee’s counsel.
Heron failed to comply with a notice requiring a response within a specified
time and failed to prosecute his appeal by filing a brief that complies with the rules
regarding service on an opposing party. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.3(a), 9.5, 42.3. The
appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 24, 2021 Opinion Delivered March 25, 2021
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winston Charles Heron v. Michael Kemp Aduddell (Winston Charles Heron v. Michael Kemp Aduddell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.