Winslow v. Winslow
7 Mass. 96
Opinion
said it would be monstrous to dissolve a marriage upon such an application. It could not be known that the party ever gave his assent to the prosecution. If he is desirous of a divorce, and has sufficient ground to obtain one, he must file his libel in his own name.
Libel dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winslow v. Winslow, 7 Mass. 96 (Mass. 1810).
7 Mass. 96 (Winslow v. Winslow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diggs v. Diggs
291 Mass. 399 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Hinkle v. Lovelace
102 S.W. 1015 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)
Lombard v. Morse
14 L.R.A. 273 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
Newton v. Nutt
58 N.H. 599 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1879)
Daniels v. Daniels
56 N.H. 219 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1875)
Garnett v. Garnett
114 Mass. 379 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1874)
Gould v. Gould
42 Mass. 382 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1840)