Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Winslow v. Winslow

Winslow v. Winslow

118 So. 3d 841, 2013 WL 2395094, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8767
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 2013·No. No. 1D13-0452·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because petitioner has failed to show that he has brought the pending motion to the attention of the trial court or made an express and distinct demand for performance, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Thomas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 74 So.3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So.2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

BENTON, C.J., RAY and MAKAR, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winslow v. Winslow, 118 So. 3d 841, 2013 WL 2395094, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

118 So. 3d 841 (Winslow v. Winslow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Al-Hakim v. State
783 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Thomas v. State, Department of Revenue
74 So. 3d 145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)