Winslow v. Reed

35 A. 1017, 89 Me. 67, 1896 Me. LEXIS 71
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided March 25, 1896·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Walton, J.

Exceptions to a compulsory nonsuit. The presiding justice seems to have assumed that when land is bounded on a private way, the same rule applies as when land is bounded on a highway, and that land so bounded extends to the center of the way. This was erroneous.

It is undoubtedly true that when land is bounded on a highway, it extends to the center of the way; but it is equally well settled in this State, whatever the rule may be elsewhere, that when land is bounded on a private way, it extends only to the side line of the way. Bangor House v. Brown, 33 Maine, 309; Ames v. Hilton, 70 Maine, 36.

Hxeeptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winslow v. Reed, 35 A. 1017, 89 Me. 67, 1896 Me. LEXIS 71 (Me. 1896).

35 A. 1017 (Winslow v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franklin Property Trust v. Foresite, Inc.
438 A.2d 218 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)
Richardson v. Richardson
78 A.2d 505 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1951)