Winslow v. Rank

246 A.D. 563
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 A.D. 563 (Winslow v. Rank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winslow v. Rank, 246 A.D. 563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Memorandum. We construe the exception contained in subdivision 2 of section 21-a of the Buffalo City Court Act (Laws of 1909, chap. 570, as amd. by Laws of 1926, chap. 333), when read in connection with the remainder of the section, as giving to the City Court of Buffalo jurisdiction of the parties in those actions — of which the case before us is one — where all the defendants are residents of Erie county and all the plaintiffs are non-residents of the county. “ Freedom to construe is not freedom to amend.” (Sexauer & Lemke v. Burke & Sons Co., 228 N. Y. 341, 345.) All concur. (The order affirmed an order of the City Court of Buffalo setting aside service of summons.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Mortuary Supply Co. v. Cox
190 Misc. 912 (Utica City Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winslow-v-rank-nyappdiv-1935.