Winslow v. Mosher

19 Me. 151
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedApril 15, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 Me. 151 (Winslow v. Mosher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winslow v. Mosher, 19 Me. 151 (Me. 1841).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Whitman C. J.

This action was tried at the Nov. Term of this Court, 1840. The plaintiff offered in evidence a deposition taken in perpetuara, by a notary public, and duly recorded in his office, but not elsewhere. The Court admitted it, though objected to by the defendant, who thereupon tendered a bill of exceptions, on account of this and other supposed errors in the ruling of the Court, which was duly allowed and signed. The question first in order to be decided is — was this deposition admissible ? If not, the other exceptions need not be noticed.

The statute concerning notaries public, passed in 1821, authorises them to take depositions in perpetuara, and requires them to record all their notarial acts, and depositions, by them taken, in books to be by them kept for the purpose. The statute is silent as to the further recording of depositions so taken, in the registry of deeds, and also as to their being admissible in evidence* when so taken, under any circumstances.

The other enactments, concerning the taking of depositions in perpetuara-, before other magistrates, required, that they should be recorded in the registry of deeds, within a specified time; upon which they, or copies of them from the registry, under certain circumstances, were to be admissible in evidence, in trials at law. This species of testimony is never so admissible, unless by special enáctment for the purpose. There being none such, in reference to depositions taken and recorded as this was, we cannot consider it as having been correctly admitted at the trial.

The exceptions are therefore sustained, and a new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark's Admr. v. Wilmington Savings Bank
93 A. 265 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Me. 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winslow-v-mosher-me-1841.