Winslow v. Hotbox Farms, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided June 10, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-01002·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MICHAEL WINSLOW, an individual, No. 2:24-cv-01002-HL

Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER

v.

HOTBOX FARMS, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, SNJ ONLINE LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, DUSTY B LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, and STEVEN MELAND, an individual,

Defendants.

BAGGIO, District Judge: On May 14, 2025, Magistrate Judge Andrew D. Hallman issued his Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”, ECF 39), recommending that this Court grant Defendants Steven Meland, SNJ Online LLC, and Hotbox Farm LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 29). No objections were filed. This Court ADOPTS Judge Hallman’s F&R. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C). If a party objects, the court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendation to which objection is made.” Id. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 US. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Ramos, 65 F.4th 427, 433 (9th Cir. 2023). While the level of scrutiny that the court applies to its F&R review depends on whether a party has filed objections, the court is free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Thomas, 474 USS. at 154. CONCLUSION Upon review, the Court agrees with Judge Hallman’s recommendation and adopts the F&R (ECF 39) in full. Accordingly, Defendants Steven Meland, SNJ Online LLC, and Hotbox Farm LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 29) is GRANTED. However, Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified in the F&R. The amended complaint is due within 30 days of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 10th day of June 2025.

United States District Judge

2 — OPINION AND ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winslow v. Hotbox Farms, LLC, (D. Or. 2025).

Winslow v. Hotbox Farms, LLC (Winslow v. Hotbox Farms, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Demetrius Ramos
65 F.4th 427 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)