Winslow v. Carthage, Sackett Harbor & Western Railroad
20 N.Y.S. 304, 71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 938
This text of 20 N.Y.S. 304 (Winslow v. Carthage, Sackett Harbor & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Winslow v. Carthage, Sackett Harbor & Western Railroad, 20 N.Y.S. 304, 71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 938 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
Opinion
No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held, (1) that an order on motion of one of several defendants directing a discontinuance of an action based upon conflicting affidavits is irregular; (2) whether the tender was good and effectual should not be determined upon conflicting affidavits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 N.Y.S. 304, 71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633, 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winslow-v-carthage-sackett-harbor-western-railroad-nysupct-1892.