Winship v. Goord

Second Circuit

Winship v. Goord

60 F. App'x 350

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2003

DocketDocket No. 01-260

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F. App'x 350 (Winship v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winship v. Goord, 60 F. App'x 350 (2d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Pro se plaintiff-appellant James Winship appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Larimer, J.) entered pursuant to a decision and order dated September 30, 2001, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees and dismissing the complaint. For the reasons stated in its thorough opinion, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Pro se plaintiff-appellant James Winship appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Larimer, J.) entered pursuant to a decision and order dated September 30, 2001, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees and dismissing the complaint. For the reasons stated in its thorough opinion, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F. App'x 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winship-v-goord-ca2-2003.