Winsett v. State

54 Ind. 437
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 54 Ind. 437 (Winsett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winsett v. State, 54 Ind. 437 (Ind. 1876).

Opinion

Niblack, J.

The appellant was indicted for retailing spirituous liquor without a license, and was tried and convicted at the November term, A. D. 1876, of the court below.

On the 29th day of January, A. D. 1877, he served notices, severally, on the clerk of that court, and on the proper prosecuting attorney, of an appeal of the cause to this court.

On-the 6th day of April, A. I). 1877, a transcript of the record in the cause was filed in this court.

The prosecuting attorney, on behalf of the appellee, moves to dismiss the appeal because, as he alleges, the transcript was not filed in this court within the time limited by law.

Our statute, providing for appeals in criminal causes, prescribes that, The appeal must be taken within one year after the judgment is rendered, and the transcript must be filed within thirty days after the appeal is taken.” 2 R. S. 1876, p. 411, sec. 161.

[438]*438“An appeal is taken by tbe service of a notice upon tbe clerk of tbe court where tbe judgment was rendered, stating that tbe appellant appeals from the judgment. If taken by tbe defendant, a similar notice must be served upon tbe prosecuting attorney. * * Id., see. 152.

Tbe appeal is considered as taken on tbe day on which notice of such appeal is served on tbe proper officers.

In this case, tbe transcript was not filed in this court within thirty days after tbe appeal was taken, and the motion will have to be sustained.

Tbe appeal is dismissed, at tbe costs of tbe appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. Cook
340 U.S. 206 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Hill v. State
11 N.E.2d 141 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1937)
Mahoney v. State
178 N.E. 233 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1931)
Dudley v. State
161 N.E. 1 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1928)
Farlow v. State
142 N.E. 849 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1924)
Clemmons v. State
1911 OK CR 48 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1911)
Ensley v. State
1910 OK CR 143 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)
Hizer v. State
89 N.E. 844 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)
Nichols v. State
61 N.E. 694 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)
Johnson v. Stephenson
4 N.E. 46 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Darr v. State
82 Ind. 11 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Price v. State
74 Ind. 553 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
State v. Quick
73 Ind. 147 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Buell v. State
69 Ind. 125 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
McLaughlin v. State
66 Ind. 193 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
State v. Walters
64 Ind. 226 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Ind. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winsett-v-state-ind-1876.