Winschel v. Director of Revenue
786 S.W.2d 200, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 432
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of Revenue (Director) appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining petitioner’s application for a hardship driving privilege. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Winschel v. Director of Revenue, 786 S.W.2d 200, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 432 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
786 S.W.2d 200 (Winschel v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.