Winquest v. Schaefer

72 N.W. 1058, 52 Neb. 626, 1897 Neb. LEXIS 165
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 1897·No. No. 7611·Published

Opinion

Harrison, J.

All the questions presented in this case, — an action instituted in the district court of Phelps county by plaintiffs in error, and removed to this court by proceedings in error, — would require for their proper determination a [627] reference to and an examination of the bill of exceptions. The document in the record which purports to be such bill is not authenticated by the clerk of the trial court and will not be considered by this court. (Romberg v. Fokken, 47 Neb., 198.) It follows that thé judgment of the district court will be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winquest v. Schaefer, 72 N.W. 1058, 52 Neb. 626, 1897 Neb. LEXIS 165 (Neb. 1897).

72 N.W. 1058 (Winquest v. Schaefer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Romberg v. Fokken
66 N.W. 282 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)