Winquest v. Schaefer

72 N.W. 1058, 52 Neb. 626, 1897 Neb. LEXIS 165
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 18, 1897
DocketNo. 7611
StatusPublished

This text of 72 N.W. 1058 (Winquest v. Schaefer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winquest v. Schaefer, 72 N.W. 1058, 52 Neb. 626, 1897 Neb. LEXIS 165 (Neb. 1897).

Opinion

Harrison, J.

All the questions presented in this case, — an action instituted in the district court of Phelps county by plaintiffs in error, and removed to this court by proceedings in error, — would require for their proper determination a [627]*627reference to and an examination of the bill of exceptions. The document in the record which purports to be such bill is not authenticated by the clerk of the trial court and will not be considered by this court. (Romberg v. Fokken, 47 Neb., 198.) It follows that thé judgment of the district court will be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Romberg v. Fokken
66 N.W. 282 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 N.W. 1058, 52 Neb. 626, 1897 Neb. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winquest-v-schaefer-neb-1897.