Winograd v. Epstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Winograd v. Epstein

119 A.D. 897, 104 N.Y.S. 1150

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1907·Published

Opinion

If there was a breach of the contract by the defendant, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the payments made and the difference between the contract price and the value of the goods at the time and place of. delivery. The payment of fifty dollars was conceded, and the évidence that the goods were worth fifty dollars more than the contract.price was not disputed. It" was, therefore, error to give judgment, for only the sum Of fifty dollars. Judgment "of the Municipal Ccjurt reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

If there was a breach of the contract by the defendant, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the payments made and the difference between the contract price and the value of the goods at the time and place of. delivery. The payment of fifty dollars was conceded, and the évidence that the goods were worth fifty dollars more than the contract.price was not disputed. It" was, therefore, error to give judgment, for only the sum Of fifty dollars. Judgment "of the Municipal Ccjurt reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Winograd v. Epstein, 119 A.D. 897, 104 N.Y.S. 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

119 A.D. 897 (Winograd v. Epstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.