Winnie Pipeline Company v. William Harrington
This text of Winnie Pipeline Company v. William Harrington (Winnie Pipeline Company v. William Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-03-0028-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
AUGUST 26, 2004
______________________________
WINNIE PIPELINE COMPANY, N/K/A ACACIA NATURAL GAS CORPORATION,
AND MITCHELL GAS SERVICES, L.P., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST
TO MITCHELL MARKETING COMPANY, F/K/A SOUTHEASTERN
MARKETING COMPANY, N/K/A DEVON GAS SERVICES, L.P.,
Appellants
v.
WILLIAM HARRINGTON,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE 221 ST DISTRICT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY;
NO. 02-10-06625-CV; HON. SUZANNE STOVALL, PRESIDING
_______________________________
On Motion to Dismiss
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Winnie Pipeline Company, n/k/a Acacia Natural Gas Corporation, and Mitchell Gas Services, L.P., successor in interest to Mitchell Marketing Company, f/k/a Southeastern Marketing Company, n/k/a Devon Gas Services, L.P. (Winnie), by and through its attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because it no longer desires to prosecute it. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Winnie Pipeline Company v. William Harrington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winnie-pipeline-company-v-william-harrington-texapp-2004.