Winney v. Leuci
This text of 189 Misc. 441 (Winney v. Leuci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum
The judgment insofar as appealed from should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to appellant against impleaded plaintiff Weisser and cross-claim dismissed.
The impleaded plaintiff acquired the automobile in question from a thief-. It follows that he may not assert against the true owner a claim for the cost of repairs or improvements made to the automobile without the owner’s knowledge or consent. (Cf. Bateman v. Clark, 263 App. Div. 789; New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc., v. Laurel Garage, Inc., 219 App. [442]*442Div. 329; Auto Dealers Discount Corp. v. Budd, 242 App. Div. 37.)
MacCrate, Steinbrink and« Rubenstein, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 Misc. 441, 74 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winney-v-leuci-nyappterm-1947.