Winnesheik Insurance v. Holzgrafe

46 Ill. 422
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 Ill. 422 (Winnesheik Insurance v. Holzgrafe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winnesheik Insurance v. Holzgrafe, 46 Ill. 422 (Ill. 1868).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It is impossible to distinguish this case from that of the Stephenson County Insurance Company v. Dunn, 45 Ill. 211.

In all its material features, it is identical with that case, and as in that, we held the summons could not be sent from Livingston county to Stephehson county, to be executed so as to give the court jurisdiction of the person of the defendant; so we must hold here, the summons could not be sent from Mason county to Stephenson county, to be executed. It can make no difference, that, in the first case, it was a suit at law, and in . this case a suit in chancery, the only law applicable to corporations being the act of 1853, the terms of which are imperative, and include all cases. Scates’ Comp. 243.

We see no objection to the matter of the bill, or to any proceeding in the cause, save the one herein noticed.

In conformity with the decision in the case cited, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dale v. Modern Woodmen of America
140 Ill. App. 16 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Ill. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winnesheik-insurance-v-holzgrafe-ill-1868.