Winner & Meyer v. Weems

77 Miss. 662
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 77 Miss. 662 (Winner & Meyer v. Weems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winner & Meyer v. Weems, 77 Miss. 662 (Mich. 1900).

Opinion

Whitfieud, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is the better view that the designation, “Southern Insurance Company of New Orleans, Louisiana,” imports sufficiently a corporation. See authorities in brief for appellants. That Winner & Meyer are partners, their names being set out as such in the affidavit in attachment, also satisfactorily appears from the record. The motion to strike from the files the traverse of the answer of the garnishee should not have been sustained. If a more specific designation had been desired than “Southern Insurance Company,” an amendment could easily have supplied it. Besides, the appellee, Weems, did not complain on the ground of insufficient- designation of his principal, in his answer for it, to the garnishment writ.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hilbun v. State
148 So. 365 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Mills v. Churchwell Motor Co.
122 So. 773 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 Miss. 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winner-meyer-v-weems-miss-1900.