Winnebago Television Corp. v. United States
Opinion
Petitioner Winnebago, operator of a UHF station at Rockford, Illinois, seeks review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission denying, after a rule-making proceeding, proposals to amend channel assignments in Madison, Wisconsin, and Rockford. After consideration of the record in light of petitioner’s contentions, we find no basis for disturbing the Commission’s action. Cf. Coastal Bend Telev. Co. v. F. C. C., 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 251, 234 F.2d 686; W. I. R. L. Television Co. v. U. S. (WIRL Television Co. v. F. C. C.) 1958, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 341, 253 F.2d 863; Springfield Television Broadcasting Corp. v. F. C. C., 104 U.S.App.D.C.-, 259 F.2d 170.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
258 F.2d 163 (Winnebago Television Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.