Home/D.C. Circuit/Winnebago Television Corp. v. United States

Winnebago Television Corp. v. United States

258 F.2d 163, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 311
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 1958
DocketNo. 14086
StatusPublished

This text of 258 F.2d 163 (Winnebago Television Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winnebago Television Corp. v. United States, 258 F.2d 163, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 311 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Winnebago, operator of a UHF station at Rockford, Illinois, seeks review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission denying, after a rule-making proceeding, proposals to amend channel assignments in Madison, Wisconsin, and Rockford. After consideration of the record in light of petitioner’s contentions, we find no basis for disturbing the Commission’s action. Cf. Coastal Bend Telev. Co. v. F. C. C., 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 251, 234 F.2d 686; W. I. R. L. Television Co. v. U. S. (WIRL Television Co. v. F. C. C.) 1958, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 341, 253 F.2d 863; Springfield Television Broadcasting Corp. v. F. C. C., 104 U.S.App.D.C.-, 259 F.2d 170.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coastal Bend Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Coastal Bend Television Company v. The United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor
234 F.2d 686 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 F.2d 163, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winnebago-television-corp-v-united-states-cadc-1958.