Winne v. Morrissey

191 A. 840, 118 N.J.L. 195, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 297
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Winne v. Morrissey. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 N.J. Misc. 771
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 30, 1937·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, except that, it appearing that the stipulated facts relate only to the judgment obtained against the surety company in the Municipal Court of New York City and the costs thereon, and nothing appearing therein touching the payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses by the surety company, we express no opinion on this point.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, with costs.

*196 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winne v. Morrissey, 191 A. 840, 118 N.J.L. 195, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 297 (N.J. 1937).

191 A. 840 (Winne v. Morrissey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.