Winne v. Morrissey
This text of 191 A. 840 (Winne v. Morrissey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, except that, it appearing that the stipulated facts relate only to the judgment obtained against the surety company in the Municipal Court of New York City and the costs thereon, and nothing appearing therein touching the payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses by the surety company, we express no opinion on this point.
The judgment under review will be affirmed, with costs.
*196 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A. 840, 118 N.J.L. 195, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winne-v-morrissey-nj-1937.