Winn v. Spearing

26 La. Ann. 384
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1874·No. No. 3545·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Morgan, J.

Plaintiff leased to the defendant a dwelling for ten months, commencing on December 1, 1870.

She brings this suit for nine months rent, and ten per cent., the agreed attorney’s fees in case of suit.

The lease is admitted, but defendant claims that by his contract the house was to be put in good repair prior to the first of February following, which he says was not done.

We do not think him justified in occupying the house free of rent because it was not put in repair. His remedy was to put his lessor in default and make the repairs, deducting the amount thereof. Under this view of the case the ruling of the judge refusing to hear testimony as to the repairs that were necessary, was correct. The appeal was evidently taken for delay.

Judgment affirmed with ten per cent, damages for a frivolous appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winn v. Spearing, 26 La. Ann. 384 (La. 1874).

26 La. Ann. 384 (Winn v. Spearing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. Classified Parking System
324 So. 2d 484 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1975)
Degrey v. Fox
205 So. 2d 849 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1968)
May v. Schepis
147 So. 717 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)
Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co.
72 So. 513 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
State v. Canton
59 So. 202 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)
Brodtman v. Finerty
41 So. 329 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)
Mullen v. Kerlec
40 So. 46 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)