Winn v. Ingram

60 S.E. 328, 3 Ga. App. 628, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 393
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 14, 1908·No. 804, 805·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

Principal and surety upon a replevy bond to a distress-warrant proceeding are joint obligors. As to tlie plaintiff’s right to recover upon the distress warrant, the surety has no controversy with the plaintiff, severable from that of his principal; hence the surety can not, without joining his principal, maintain certiorari to correct alleged errors upon the trial which has resulted in a judgment against the defendant, and therefore also against his surety. Harrell v. Marshall, 125 Ga. 451 (54 S. E. 93); Waldrop v. Wolff, 114 Ga. 610, 620 (7), (40 S. E. 830); Clark v. Blalock, 114 Ga. 309 (40 S. E. 228); Norris v. Pollard, 75 Ga. 358. Section 4461 of the Civil Code is not applicable, to certiorari eases, but applies to appeals only.

Judgment reversed on the cross-hill of exceptions; main hill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winn v. Ingram, 60 S.E. 328, 3 Ga. App. 628, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

60 S.E. 328 (Winn v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norris v. Pollard
75 Ga. 358 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)
Clark v. Blalock
40 S.E. 228 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Waldrop v. Wolff
40 S.E. 830 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Harwell v. Marshall
54 S.E. 93 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)