Winn v. Commissioner

1998 T.C. Memo. 71, 75 T.C.M. 1840, 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 68
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedFebruary 19, 1998
DocketTax Ct. Dkt. No. 5358-96; Docket No. 5359-96
StatusUnpublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 1998 T.C. Memo. 71 (Winn v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winn v. Commissioner, 1998 T.C. Memo. 71, 75 T.C.M. 1840, 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 68 (tax 1998).

Opinion

PHILIP D. AND ELEANOR G. WINN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; PHILIP D. AND ELEANOR G. WINN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent *; DAVID A. AND LOUISE A. GITLITZ, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Winn v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 5358-96; Docket No. 5359-96
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1998-71; 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 68; 75 T.C.M. (CCH) 1840; T.C.M. (RIA) 98071;
February 19, 1998, Filed
Keith G. Medleau, for respondent.
Darrell D. Hallett, Larry N. Johnson, Robert J. Chicoine, and John M. Colvin, for petitioners.
COHEN, CHIEF JUDGE.

COHEN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COHEN, CHIEF JUDGE: In Winn v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-286, we concluded that respondent's motions for summary judgment should be denied, and petitioners' cross-motions for partial summary judgment should be granted. Thereafter, respondent filed a motion for reconsideration. Released today is the Opinion in Nelson v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. ___ (1998), in which the Court decides the same legal issue, to wit, whether discharge of indebtedness income to an S corporation increases a shareholder's basis in the stock of the corporation, in favor of respondent. The arguments discussed in Nelson were fully briefed and argued in these cases. Under*69 these circumstances, respondent's motion for reconsideration will be granted. This Memorandum Opinion replaces T.C. Memo. 1997-286, which is hereby withdrawn.

BACKGROUND

Respondent determined a deficiency of $242,555 in Philip D. and Eleanor G. Winn's (the Winns) 1992 Federal income tax and a deficiency of $251,192 in David A. and Louise A. Gitlitz's (the Gitlitzes) 1991 Federal income tax. At the time their respective petitions were filed, all petitioners resided in Colorado.

Philip D. Winn (Winn) and David A. Gitlitz (Gitlitz) were shareholders in P.D.W.& A., Inc. (PDW&A), a Colorado corporation. In 1991, PDW&A had an election in effect to be taxed as an S corporation. Effective January l, 1992, PDW&A revoked its S corporation election.

PDW&A was a partner in Parker Properties Joint Venture (Parker). Parker realized $4,154,891 in discharge of indebtedness income in 1991. PDW&A's distributive share of Parker's discharge of indebtedness income in 1991 was $2,021,296. At the time that Parker realized the discharge of indebtedness income, PDW&A was insolvent to the extent of $2,181,748.

Winn increased his basis in his PDW&A stock by*70 the amount of his pro rata share ($1,010,648) of the discharge of indebtedness income. Winn did not claim a loss on the Winns' 1991 Federal income tax return because Winn believed that the passive activity loss limitations prevented him from doing so. On the Winns' 1992 Federal income tax return, Winn claimed losses from PDW&A that were carried over from 1991 totaling $1,010,648.

Gitlitz increased his basis in his PDW&A stock by the amount of his pro rata share ($1,010,648) of the discharge of indebtedness income. Gitlitz claimed losses from PDW&A totaling $1,010,648 on the Gitlitzes' 1991 Federal income tax return. Absent the basis increase, the deductibility of these losses would have been suspended under section 1366(d), I.R.C.

Respondent disallowed the losses claimed by Winn and Gitlitz on the premise Winn and Gitlitz lacked sufficient basis in their PDW&A stock.

DISCUSSION

Under Rule 121, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, a summary adjudication may be made "if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, admissions, and any other acceptable materials, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material*71 fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law." Rule 121(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. The parties agree that whether discharge of indebtedness income increases a taxpayer's basis in his S corporation stock may be decided as a matter of law.

In Nelson v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. ___, filed this date, the Court agreed with respondent that a shareholder of an insolvent S corporation may not increase his or her basis to reflect discharge of indebtedness income to the S corporation. That Opinion is controlling here. Respondent's motions for summary judgment will be granted, and petitioners' cross-motions for partial summary judgment will be denied.

Appropriate orders will be issued.


Footnotes

  • *. This opinion replaces the prior opinion of this Court in these cases, Winn v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-286, which is hereby withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Harold D. Farley Gail D. Farley
202 F.3d 198 (Third Circuit, 2000)
Bettisworth v. Commissioner
2000 T.C. Memo. 30 (U.S. Tax Court, 2000)
Cronin v. Commissioner
1999 T.C. Memo. 22 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)
Friedman v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 196 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Nelson v. Commissioner
110 T.C. No. 12 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Mel T. Nelson v. Commissioner
110 T.C. No. 12 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1998 T.C. Memo. 71, 75 T.C.M. 1840, 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winn-v-commissioner-tax-1998.