Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Sams
This text of 281 So. 2d 47 (Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Sams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant defendant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of its motion to dismiss' this class action.1 We reverse.
We have carefully considered the briefs, arguments of counsel and the record before us and must agree that the appellee has failed to sufficiently allege the necessary requisites of a bona fide class action. Port Royal, Inc. v. Convoy, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 734. Merely, “touching all the bases”, so to speak, with general allegations is an insufficient foundation for a true class action. See, Hendler v. Rogers House Condominium, Inc., Fla.App.1970, 234 So.2d 128, and cases cited therein. Moreover, it is the responsibility of the plaintiff to provide to the court any documents upon which his alleged cause of [48]*48action is based. R.C.P. 1.130, 30 F.S.A. Accordingly, the order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion to dismiss is reversed with directions for the trial court to dismiss appellee’s complaint without prejudice to the filing of an amended complaint.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 So. 2d 47, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winn-dixie-stores-inc-v-sams-fladistctapp-1973.