Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Cochran
This text of 540 So. 2d 914 (Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to tax costs. Appellant timely offered to settle the case for an amount which exceeded the amount ultimately obtained by the appellee. The rule, Rule 1.442, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure,1 specifically says “If the judgment finally obtained by the adverse party is not more favorable than the offer, he must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer.”
For some reason unexplained by the trial judge and unsupported by any substantial legal argument of appellee, the trial judge denied the proper motion of appellant. Ap-pellee asserts that the trial judge has discretion not to award taxable costs. That is not so. There is some discretion to decide what costs are taxable but the trial judge must adhere to the rules of civil procedure and order payment of all reasonable and necessary costs incurred after the making of the offer of judgment.
The order denying the award is quashed and this cause remanded for entry of a proper order and judgment.
ORDER QUASHED, REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
540 So. 2d 914, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 799, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1594, 1989 WL 28367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winn-dixie-stores-inc-v-cochran-fladistctapp-1989.