Winkles v. Thorne Industries

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided January 3, 1997·No. I.C. No. 455206·Published

Opinion

The Commission found in this case that the treating physician's rating of 10% to the hand did not reliably quantify a permanent partial impairment compensable under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-31(12) because, as he stated, but for her scar, he might not have given the plaintiff a rating at all, and therefore, the Commission made an award for disfigurement under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-31(22). However, the opinion erroneously included a finding that the plaintiff did suffer a 10% permanent partial disability to her right hand in paragraph #14.

Consequently, IT IS ORDERED that Finding of Fact #14 is STRICKEN, and that as so amended, the Opinion and Award for the Full Commission remains in force and effect from the date of its filing.

S/ _______________________ J. RANDOLPH WARD COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/ _________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

S/ _________________________ COY M. VANCE COMMISSIONER

JRW:md

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winkles v. Thorne Industries, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1997).

Winkles v. Thorne Industries (Winkles v. Thorne Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 97-31
North Carolina § 97-31(12)