Winkles v. State

132 S.E. 781, 35 Ga. App. 252, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 675
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1926
Docket17110
StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 781 (Winkles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winkles v. State, 132 S.E. 781, 35 Ga. App. 252, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 675 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., not participating, on account of illness. Astor Merritt, for plaintiff in error. E. 8. Griffith, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 781, 35 Ga. App. 252, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winkles-v-state-gactapp-1926.