Winkles v. Simpson Grocery Co.

63 S.E. 627, 132 Ga. 32, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 29
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 11, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 63 S.E. 627 (Winkles v. Simpson Grocery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winkles v. Simpson Grocery Co., 63 S.E. 627, 132 Ga. 32, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 29 (Ga. 1909).

Opinion

Holden, J.

The neglect of a party excepting to an auditor’s report on matters of fact, or on matters of law dependent for their decision upon the evidence, to set forth, in connection with each exception of law or of fact, the evidence necessary to he considered in passing thereon, or to point out the same hy appropriate reference, or to attach as exhibits; to his exceptions those portions of the evidence relied on to support the exceptions, is a sufficient reason, in an equity ease, for refusing to approve the exceptions of fact and for overruling the exceptions of law. Orr v. Cooledge, 125 Ga. 496 (54 S. E. 618).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fuqua v. Hadden
16 S.E.2d 728 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Faucett v. Rogers
108 S.E. 798 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Smith v. Wilkinson
85 S.E. 875 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
McCord v. City of Jackson
69 S.E. 23 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 S.E. 627, 132 Ga. 32, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winkles-v-simpson-grocery-co-ga-1909.