Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 26, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 5, 1953
DocketC. D. 1494
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 30 Cust. Ct. 26 (Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 26, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3 (cusc 1953).

Opinion

Lawkence, Judge:'

Certain imported merchandise described in the record as “Seamless hot rolled A. P. I. Casings” was classified by the collector of customs pursuant to the provision in paragraph 328 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 328) for “all other finished or unfinished iron or steel tubes not specially provided for,” [27]*27and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 25 per centum ad. valorem. The initials A. P. I. are an abbreviation for the words American Petroleum Institute.

Although it is claimed in the protest that the merchandise should be classified as “pipes” in said paragraph 328, and dutiable at the rate of three-fourths of 1 cent per pound, the claim mainly relied upon, invoked by an amendment to the protest, is that the merchandise should be classified as “structural shapes of iron or steel * * * machined * * * or otherwise advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting” in paragraph 312 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 312), as modified by the trade agreement between the United States and Belgium, 67 Treas. Dec. 470, T. D. 47600, effective May 1, 1935, and dutiable at 15 per centum ad valorem.

The competing provisions of the statutes are here set forth, the language pertinent to this case being emphasized.

Pab. 328. Lap-welded, butt-welded, seamed, or jointed iron or steel tubes, pipes, flues, and stays, not thinner than sixty-five one-thousandths of one inch, if not less than three-eighths of one inch in diameter, three-fourths of 1 cent per pound; if less than three-eighths and not less than one-fourth of one inch in diameter, .1/4 cents per pound; if less than one-fourth of one inch in diameter, 1)4 cents per pound: Provided, That no tubes, pipes, flues, or stays made of charcoal iron shall be subject to a less rate of duty than lj4 cents per pound; cylindrical and tubular tanks or vessels, for holding gas, liquids, or other material, whether full or empty; welded cylindrical furnaces, tubes and flues made from plate metal, whether corrugated, ribbed, or otherwise reinforced against collapsing pressure, and all other finished or unfinished iron or steel tubes not specially provided for, 85 per centum ad valorem; flexible metal tubing or hose, whether covered' with wire or other material, including any appliances or attachments affixed thereto, not specially provided for, and rigid iron or steel tubes or pipes prepared and lined or coated in any manner suitable for use as conduits for electrical conductors, 30 per centum ad valorem.
TI6DBzIR8PjDK8l1H8g

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Imperial Pipe & Supply Co. v. United States
66 Cust. Ct. 403 (U.S. Customs Court, 1971)
C. Tennant Sons & Co. v. United States
49 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)
Baron Tube Co. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 85 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)
United Supply & Mfg. Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 95 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)
Tower v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 138 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 32 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Cust. Ct. 26, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winkler-koch-engineering-co-v-united-states-cusc-1953.