Winkleman v. Cowan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Winkleman v. Cowan

122 P. 896, 86 Kan. 981, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 428

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 6, 1912

DocketNo. 17,364

StatusPublished

This text of 122 P. 896 (Winkleman v. Cowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winkleman v. Cowan, 122 P. 896, 86 Kan. 981, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 428 (kan 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

No prejudice could have resulted from the refusal of the first instruction asked. It made no difference whether the property belonged to the mortgagors jointly as partners or severally as individuals.. The fourth instruction refused was fairly covered by the instructions given. We find no error in the instructions, and, while the verdict may be contrary to the weight of evidence, there was sufficient evidence to support it; and since it has been approved by the trial court the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

No prejudice could have resulted from the refusal of the first instruction asked. It made no difference whether the property belonged to the mortgagors jointly as partners or severally as individuals.. The fourth instruction refused was fairly covered by the instructions given. We find no error in the instructions, and, while the verdict may be contrary to the weight of evidence, there was sufficient evidence to support it; and since it has been approved by the trial court the judgment must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 P. 896, 86 Kan. 981, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winkleman-v-cowan-kan-1912.