Winkle v. State

164 So. 3d 737, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7537, 2015 WL 2393463
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 2015
DocketNo. 2D13-2124
StatusPublished

This text of 164 So. 3d 737 (Winkle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winkle v. State, 164 So. 3d 737, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7537, 2015 WL 2393463 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right the appellant might have to file a facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 3d 737, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7537, 2015 WL 2393463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winkle-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.