Winkle v. Bannan

368 U.S. 34, 82 S. Ct. 146, 7 L. Ed. 2d 91, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 201
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 6, 1961
Docket93, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 368 U.S. 34 (Winkle v. Bannan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Winkle v. Bannan, 368 U.S. 34, 82 S. Ct. 146, 7 L. Ed. 2d 91, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 201 (1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and, as suggested by the Attorney General of Michigan, the case is remanded for consideration in light of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. George Ochs
595 F.2d 1247 (Second Circuit, 1979)
Winkle v. Kropp
279 F. Supp. 532 (E.D. Michigan, 1968)
People v. Henderson
149 N.W.2d 258 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1967)
People v. Blessing
142 N.W.2d 709 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1966)
In Re Winkle
125 N.W.2d 875 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1964)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stoner v. Myers
185 A.2d 806 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
State v. Smith
181 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 U.S. 34, 82 S. Ct. 146, 7 L. Ed. 2d 91, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winkle-v-bannan-scotus-1961.