Wink v. MAGROWSKI

9 A.3d 1137, 607 Pa. 626, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2873
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 13, 2010·No. 525 MAL 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to that court upon the record evidence establishing that the petition to open was filed within ten days after the Prothonotary sent the requisite notice of the entry of the judgment on the docket under Pa.R.C.P. 237.3(b). We direct the Superior court to further remand this matter to the trial court to consider in the first instance whether the Petitioners’ proposed answer presented a meritorious defense.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wink v. MAGROWSKI, 9 A.3d 1137, 607 Pa. 626, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2873 (Pa. 2010).

9 A.3d 1137 (Wink v. MAGROWSKI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the November 3, 2009 Election for Council
9 A.3d 1137 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)