Wink v. MAGROWSKI

9 A.3d 1137, 607 Pa. 626, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2873
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 13, 2010
Docket525 MAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 A.3d 1137 (Wink v. MAGROWSKI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wink v. MAGROWSKI, 9 A.3d 1137, 607 Pa. 626, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2873 (Pa. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to that court upon the record evidence establishing that the petition to open was filed within ten days after the Prothonotary sent the requisite notice of the entry of the judgment on the docket under Pa.R.C.P. 237.3(b). We direct the Superior court to further remand this matter to the trial court to consider in the first instance whether the Petitioners’ proposed answer presented a meritorious defense.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the November 3, 2009 Election for Council
9 A.3d 1137 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.3d 1137, 607 Pa. 626, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wink-v-magrowski-pa-2010.