Winig, J. v. Office of DA of Phila
This text of Winig, J. v. Office of DA of Phila (Winig, J. v. Office of DA of Phila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
JASON WINIG, : No. 133 EAL 2023 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT : ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, : LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, ESQUIRE, : BRANWEN MCNABB, ESQUIRE, : MICHELLE MICHELSON, ESQUIRE, : WILLIAM BURROWS, ESQUIRE AND : HELEN PARK, ESQUIRE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW this 5th day of December, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The Application to Withdraw as
Counsel filed by Petitioner’s counsel, Walter Weir, Jr., Esquire and Weir Greenblatt Pierce
LLP, is also GRANTED. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue,
rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether law enforcement officers are immune from civil suits under Section 5725 of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, 18 Pa.C.S. § 5725?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Winig, J. v. Office of DA of Phila, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winig-j-v-office-of-da-of-phila-pa-2023.