Winig, J. v. Office of DA of Phila

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 5, 2023·No. 133 EAL 2023 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

JASON WINIG, : No. 133 EAL 2023 :

Petitioner :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : :

THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT : ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, : LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, ESQUIRE, : BRANWEN MCNABB, ESQUIRE, : MICHELLE MICHELSON, ESQUIRE, : WILLIAM BURROWS, ESQUIRE AND : HELEN PARK, ESQUIRE, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW this 5th day of December, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The Application to Withdraw as

Counsel filed by Petitioner’s counsel, Walter Weir, Jr., Esquire and Weir Greenblatt Pierce

LLP, is also GRANTED. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue,

rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether law enforcement officers are immune from civil suits under Section 5725 of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, 18 Pa.C.S. § 5725?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winig, J. v. Office of DA of Phila, (Pa. 2023).

Winig, J. v. Office of DA of Phila (Winig, J. v. Office of DA of Phila) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 5725
Pennsylvania § 5725