Wings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wings v. State

495 S.W.3d 224, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 712, 2016 WL 4040106

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 26, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103518

StatusPublished

This text of 495 S.W.3d 224 (Wings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wings v. State, 495 S.W.3d 224, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 712, 2016 WL 4040106 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Wings appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Wings appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

495 S.W.3d 224, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 712, 2016 WL 4040106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wings-v-state-moctapp-2016.