Wings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wings v. State

495 S.W.3d 224, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 712, 2016 WL 4040106

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 26, 2016·No. No. ED 103518·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Wings appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Wings appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Wings v. State, 495 S.W.3d 224, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 712, 2016 WL 4040106 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

495 S.W.3d 224 (Wings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.