Wingreen Company v. Brock
This text of 401 F.2d 776 (Wingreen Company v. Brock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
401 F.2d 776
In the Matter of The WINGREEN COMPANY, Herbert N. Schwarz and Bart L. Cohen, practicing law as Schwarz and Cohen, Appellants,
v.
J. H. BROCK, Trustee in Reorganization, in the matter of The Wingreen Co., Debtor, Appellee.
No. 26685.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
November 8, 1968.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; William O. Mehrtens, Judge.
Daniel Neal Heller, Miami, Fla., for appellants.
Irving M. Wolff, Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before GEWIN, BELL and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this bankruptcy case the district court entered an order requiring the appellant-attorneys to produce certain evidence. The appellee-trustee assured the court during oral argument that the evidence sought has been otherwise obtained and that the trustee does not intend to assert any right or remedy under the district court's order. During oral argument both the appellants and the appellee agreed that the issue here involved is now moot. Therefore, the case is remanded to the district court with directions to vacate the order granting motion to compel answers entered on the 12th day of July, 1968.
Remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 F.2d 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wingreen-company-v-brock-ca5-1968.