Wingo v. State
377 S.W.3d 615, 2012 WL 3950368, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1100
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wingo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 624 →
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Dwayne Wingo, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wingo v. State, 377 S.W.3d 615, 2012 WL 3950368, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1100 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
377 S.W.3d 615 (Wingo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.